Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:49

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Popular rock band thrown off concert lineup after icon’s wife fights with band manager - NJ.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Meta Ray-Ban Glasses are at their Lowest Price Ever: Deal of the Day - NBC News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why Adding More Bananas to Your Diet Could Impact Your Blood Pressure - Prevention
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Quantum Vacuum Breakthrough: Oxford Physicists Make Light Emerge From “Nothing” - SciTechDaily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Biotech pauses trial after second patient death linked to gene therapy - The Washington Post
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
When you visit a store, do you go to shop or buy?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: